Your looking for memorized deck work, right?
Me too. but I had already learned how to memorizea deck from the Nikola stack chapter at the end of Encyclopdedia of Card tricks.
I foundAronson's stack on the internet and memorized it.
So I wanted 'bound to please' to learn somegood mem deck work.
Problem is, there are some mem deck effects, but most are card tricks formagicians.. Quite simply, I find (right now) one of the most potent tricks with any mem deck issimply have spec take a card, you glimpse any adjacent card to INSTANTLY tell him his card. For alay spec, its complete mastery of a 'selection-location'. He picks any card. You instantly nameit.
Was it Dai Vernon who said something like, the simpler an effect is to describe, the morepowerful it is? (e.g. Invisible Deck: A thought of card. Only one reversed. (Minds blown!))
.. this is NOT the case with what I'm seeing from Aronson's work. IN FACT he oftendeliberately makes procedures MORE 'muddy' to disguise the simpler true method. This is ONLY tothrow of knowledgeable cardicians.
A the end of one of the enclosed books, 'A stack toremember', is a bibiliography of mem-deck work'. Perhaps any of these would be more interesting tome.
Also, I feel somewhat underwhelmed by 'shuffle-bored' for the same reasons mentioned above.Is it really that earth-shattering to predict how many cards are face up in a face down deck? Again, the procedure is too muddy.
This material will intrigue magicians that you performfor, so get it if you want to wow your buddies at the magic club. But for a lay audience, stickwith more entertaining or direct effects.